Skip to main content
Budget Explorer

FY2017 · Net Financing

Adopted

Special Revenue Transfers — Net

Net transfer line used before the source separated transfers in and transfers out

Internal county movement; not outside revenue

FY2017

How has it changed?

Compare the approved plan, reported results, or the county's estimates across years. Dollar amounts are as reported at the time; they are not adjusted for inflation or population.

The spending or funding plan approved by County Council for each fiscal year.

The FY2017 adopted amount was higher by $199,113.

+1.3%

The percentage uses the absolute size of the earlier negative amount as its denominator.

Five-year trend: FY2013–FY2017

One continuous line is shown because all five annual figures use this same published basis.

Down $5,836,690 (-62.5%) from FY2013 to FY2017.

Select a year on the chart to open its adopted budget detail page.

-$9,341,660-$15,377,463FY2013: -$9,341,660FY2014: -$11,721,893FY2015: -$11,786,146FY2016: -$15,377,463FY2017: -$15,178,350FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017
Annual figures and sources in this chart
Annual adopted dollars figures from FY2013 through FY2017
YearAmountSource
FY2013-$9,341,660FY2012-13, p.43
FY2014-$11,721,893FY2014-15, p.48
FY2015-$11,786,146FY2014-15, p.48
FY2016-$15,377,463FY2016-17, p.46
FY2017-$15,178,350FY2016-17, p.46
Annual figures use the selected published basis. Missing years and comparability boundaries split the line rather than being estimated.
Download this series (CSV)

Does a figure or citation look wrong? Report an error

What this site covers for the Special Revenue Fund

Covered

Complete at the selected Special Revenue Funds' published summary-category level. Named-fund totals are covered separately, but detail within each named fund is not.

History

Every year this line appears, with the document each figure was read from. Years with nothing published say so; they are never turned into zero. A numeric zero is shown as $0. When the county printed a dash, † marks the site’s arithmetic-zero representation.

  1. FY2017
    Adopted-$15,178,350
    FY2016-17, p.46printed as “Transfers”
  2. FY2016
    Adopted-$15,377,463
    FY2016-17, p.46printed as “Transfers”
  3. FY2015
    Actual-$15,610,652
    as printed in FY2016-17, p.46printed as “Transfers”
    Adopted-$11,786,146
    FY2014-15, p.48printed as “Transfers”
  4. FY2014
    Actual-$13,507,586
    as printed in FY2016-17, p.46printed as “Transfers”
    Adopted-$11,721,893
    FY2014-15, p.48printed as “Transfers”
  5. FY2013
    Actual-$10,516,438
    as printed in FY2014-15, p.48printed as “Transfers”
    Adopted-$9,341,660
    FY2012-13, p.43printed as “Transfers”
  6. FY2012
    Actual-$11,813,141
    as printed in FY2014-15, p.48printed as “Transfers”
    Adopted-$8,464,358
    FY2012-13, p.43printed as “Transfers”

    basis changes below

  7. FY2011
    Actual-$10,608,314
    as printed in FY2012-13, p.43printed as “Transfers”
  8. FY2010
    Actual-$12,228,446
    as printed in FY2012-13, p.43printed as “Transfers”

Download this series (CSV) — every year, with the source document, printed page and PDF page for each figure.